Listen — the words stay hidden. Use your ears.Tap any word to see its meaningNow, the official explanation, if you can call it that, is that the records were misplaced due to a 'clerical oversight.' Granted, mistakes happen—no one's denying that. But the point I'd push back on is the sheer improbability of such a significant oversight, especially when we're talking about a period where critical decisions were supposedly made.To put it in perspective, imagine losing three months' worth of financial transactions in a Fortune 500 company. Wouldn't that raise a few eyebrows?Now, some might argue that it's a simple human error, and sure, that's a possibility. But given the stakes involved, I'm not entirely convinced.What's more, there's a particular document that surfaces right after this gap, and it conveniently aligns with a narrative that benefits the party in question. Coincidence? Perhaps.But, as any seasoned investigator would tell you, coincidences in such contexts are often more than they seem. So, while I admit there's some uncertainty here, the weight of the evidence leans heavily toward something more deliberate than accidental.
